South Carolina Injury Law Firm BLOG

FDA Releases Safety Warning Regarding Multaq (Dronedarone)

February 22nd, 2012

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning regarding the drug Multaq, the trade name for the pharmacological drug dronedarone, as it may be causing serious complications in patients. First approved in 2009, there have been 1.3 million prescriptions written for the drug and another estimated 278,000 people have purchased the drug through outpatient retail facilities. When taken by patients suffering from the heart rhythm condition permanent atrial fibrillation (AF), it may cause serious cardiovascular events including heart attack, stroke and death. The FDA has made the following recommendations for the prescription of Multaq: It should not be prescribed to patients with AF who cannot or will not be converted to normal sinus rhythm (permanent AF), because Multaq doubles the rate of heart failure in such patients Doctors must monitor the patient’s heart rhythm by electrocardiogram (ECG) at least once every three months Patients taking Multaq should receive…
Read More »

What are the Most Common Reasons for a Drug Recall?

February 20th, 2012

This week, our blog is discussing defective drugs and devices causing personal injuries to unknowing consumers. Many cases involving defective drugs or devices harming individuals begin with a recall, where the manufacturer either voluntarily removes the product from the market or the FDA requests or demands the drug be recalled. There is a variety of reasons a drug is pulled either voluntarily or involuntarily, but the three main categories of defective drugs are: Mislabeled drugs or misinformation on the package. This occurred last year when Pfizer voluntarily recalled the drug Citalopram, used to treat depression, and the drug Finasteride, used to treat prostatic hyperplasia, as the labels had been switched. This was especially dangerous to the public as Finasteride is alleged to cause fetal abnormalities in pregnant women. Defects in manufacturing the drug, such as contamination or potency problems. This made huge headlines recently when pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline was charged…
Read More »

Forced Arbitration Clauses are Unconstitutional Violations of the 7th Amendment

February 17th, 2012

Continuing our discussion of how corporations unlawfully seek to remove their responsibility to injured individuals, today’s blog will discuss another threat to Americans’ constitutional rights. Forced arbitration clauses attempt to remove corporate accountability to injured individuals by removing their constitutional right to a trial by jury. The clauses are often found in nursing home contracts; if a person dies due to nursing home abuse or neglect, the corporation owning the home will use the contract to prevent the family from seeking justice via a wrongful death lawsuit before a jury. Jury trials expose the responsible party and hold them publically accountable to prevent such harm in the future. This will not occur in private arbitration. The 7th Amendment provides that for all suits at common law, “the right of trial by jury shall be preserved.” Mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts of adhesion are unconstitutional, as they violate this basic constitutional…
Read More »