-
-
Recent Posts
- Child-Proof Your Home to Prevent Scalding Burn Injuries
- Fire Safety Plans Save Lives and are Essential for Families
- When Was the Last Time You Checked Your Smoke Alarms?
- World Anti-Doping Authority Listed DMAA as a Banned Stimulant
- FDA Investigating the Marketing and Use of DMAA as a Dietary Supplement
-
Let Us Review Your Case
Categories
- Antitrust Law
- Auto Accidents
- Bed Sores
- Birth Injuries
- Brain Injuries
- Burn Injuries
- Business Litigation
- Cerebral Palsy
- Class Action
- Construction Accidents
- Construction Litigation
- Consumer Protection Laws
- Court Ordered Interrogatories
- Defective Drug Recalls
- Defective Products
- Dehydration
- Federal Courts
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- Federal Tort Claims
- Food Poisoning
- Injury Litigation
- Malnutrition
- McGowan Hood & Felder LLC
- Medical Malpractice
- Motorcycle Accidents
- Multi District Litigation
- Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Peanut Butter
- Peanut Butter Poinsoning
- Pharmacy Errors
- Truck Accidents
- Workers Compensation
- Wrongful Death
Archives
Category Archives: Defective Products
Pharmaceutical companies not only release defective drugs upon the unknowing public, but defective medical products as well. The New York Times reported that pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson decided to sell its defective DuPuy hip implants to unknowing consumers overseas, since the artificial hip implant was banned by the FDA for sale in the United States in 2010. The reason for the FDA ban on the hip implant is that it was faulty by design. Marketed under the name ASR (articular surface replacement device) by the DuPuy orthopedic division of Johnson & Johnson, the all-metal hip replacement implant had a high premature failure rate in patients. The faulty implant also sheds tiny particles of metallic debris, crippling the very people it is supposed to have healed. Hip implant surgery is extremely invasive and the recovery time is long and painful, even when the surgery goes well. It is unconscionable that…
Read More »
A new study on transvaginal mesh implants published in the January edition of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology confirms an already widely-held belief: that women implanted with the devices to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) usually require additional surgery more often than women treated by other methods. This blog has been closely following stories regarding women who have been implanted with these potentially defective products and the consequences thereof. This new study looked at 32 women who had transvaginal mesh implants to correct POP and 33 women who had their POP treated by other methods. They found that 15.6 percent of women with the implant needed corrective surgery within one year of implantation. The study further concluded that women treated by other means saw a comparable reduction in symptoms over the implant patients. Since 2008, the FDA has received approximately 3,000 complaints regarding transvaginal mesh implants and have…
Read More »